A economic quanta should always be in further stand as;
Economic development--->Economic growth--->Economic progress--->Economic welfare in a cycle of epistemology that could lead up to a consequence as desirable.
Economies as a result of monetary transactions always stand for a level and type of economics which is an evidence of superstructure from an infrastructural through a technique of developed mentality.It reveals an incremental growth through progressive sequences making over socio-economic, cultural and political empowerment and uplifts surmounting to always needed welfare of common peoples.It prepares an industrialized mode of commercialization.Reduces unemployment through increased " capitalism".Could have severe implication of "fatalism" through intolerable levels of competitions.Does not stands similar to all.Can be a major causality for gap between poor and rich through ever increasing discrimination's in stratification's.A major source of dialectics of conflicting functionalism.Could lead a developed underdevelopment.Could welfare rich only.Must be empirical rather in theory.
Economic development--->Economic growth--->Economic progress--->Economic welfare in a cycle of epistemology that could lead up to a consequence as desirable.
Economies as a result of monetary transactions always stand for a level and type of economics which is an evidence of superstructure from an infrastructural through a technique of developed mentality.It reveals an incremental growth through progressive sequences making over socio-economic, cultural and political empowerment and uplifts surmounting to always needed welfare of common peoples.It prepares an industrialized mode of commercialization.Reduces unemployment through increased " capitalism".Could have severe implication of "fatalism" through intolerable levels of competitions.Does not stands similar to all.Can be a major causality for gap between poor and rich through ever increasing discrimination's in stratification's.A major source of dialectics of conflicting functionalism.Could lead a developed underdevelopment.Could welfare rich only.Must be empirical rather in theory.
0 comments:
Post a Comment